What’s worth mentioning is that this attribute is currently not available for macOS, Linux, and iOS users. Its Android version, on the other hand, offers an inverse split tunneling feature – you can only disable the VPN for individual apps. So, they’d connect to the VPN automatically every time you open the app. The Windows app allows you to enable or disable the VPN for specific applications. NordVPN offers the split tunneling feature for Windows and Android users. It’s useful if you want to watch geo-restricted content on a streaming platform and download files at the same time without any loss of speed. Split tunneling is specifically designed to help you manage which apps should use the VPN connection and which ones shouldn’t. These extras create additional value to the overall service and I would definitely call it a winner. However, NordVPN goes an extra mile to improve user experience and provides additional features, like the dark web monitoring, specialty servers, and the SmartPlay technology. Both VPNs have the essential attributes, like the split tunneling and an in-built ad blocker which you get with the subscription. The Mullvad vs NordVPN feature comparison is quite straightforward. However, if you want to get the greatest speeds, you should definitely opt for the WireGuard protocol as both providers offer the best performance with it.
Mullvad in this case also delivered relatively better results – 9% download and 68% upload speed reduction.Īll in all, both Mullvad and NordVPN are fast VPNs. NordVPN showed an average of 39% download and 64% upload speed loss. So, the results were more promising as well. OpenVPN UDP is another version of this protocol which is faster. Mullvad delivered better results showing an average download speed drop of 71% and 84% upload speed drop. Likewise, NordVPN showed an average speed loss of 87% in both downloads and uploads. When testing the VPNs with the OpenVPN TCP protocol, it’s important to keep in mind that this protocol is focused on security and not speeds. However, virtually both providers offer equally great speeds. Mullvad, on the other hand, showed slightly larger average losses – 15% in download speed and 40% in upload speed.
NordVPN showed an average of a 20% download and a 36% upload speed drop. Baseline: 1 ms/300 Mbps download/300 Mbps uploadĭuring the test, NordVPN and Mullvad both performed well with the WireGuard protocol.Both Mullvad and NordVPN support WireGuard and OpenVPN (TCP/UDP) protocols, so I have tested the speed performance with each of them individually. The VPN speed performance depends on multiple variables, one of which is the tunneling protocol.
0 kommentar(er)
